ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in 15 seconds.
Subscribe to Interior Design
RSS
Email

Share this on
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter

A Tale of Two Decades

February 8, 2009


Mid-century Phillips speaker

Design sometimes transcends its moment and continues to look fresh, and by virtue of this, timeless. Such is the case with some of the products designed by Braun or Olivetti. Other times—and this is not necessarily a bad thing—design gets caught up in its moment and winds up encapsulating or expressing a specific cultural or stylistic fact. These products may work well, and wind up in use for years, but they betray their production date at a glance, and retrospective interest in them is inevitably tinged by nostalgia.

One such design, pictured above, is a free-standing speaker attributed to Phillips. The housing is plastic, the grille perforated metal. If I had to pick a date of production—and I don’t know for sure—I would pick the mid-1950’s. I would not pick the 1940’s, nor would I pick the 1960’s, at least not after 1965. This speaker looks to me like nothing so much as a Morris Lapidus hotel on Collins Avenue. I can almost picture the palm trees lining the circular drive in front, and the biomorphic pool fronting the beach in the back. I don’t know if the tweeter is separated from the woofer, but the top pivots, throwing the swooping curve into sharp relief. I think it looks cooler this way, and I think the hotel it resembles would look cooler this way, too.


The Fontainebleau Hotel taken from "Morris Lapidus: Architect of the American Dream," 1992.

In any event, the logo on the front—possibly a PH in a box—is also of the era, and the enitre design exudes 1950’s style and swagger. Despite being dated in this way, I would hesitate to call this design kitschy. The best definition of kitsch I’ve encountered, outside of the one in the dictionary, is an object that conveys everything it has to convey at a glance. I’ve had this speaker (actually, a pair of them) for several years, and I am still intrigued by them, and without irony. This has something to do with the way the appearance changes when the top is straight or askew, how different it looks from the front and the back, and how the brass grille catches the light, sometimes shimmering, sometimes stopping the eye at the surface, and sometimes permitting the eye to see through—almost like architecture. Also, I suspect the speaker would sound good if I could plug it in to anything, especially with the top part swiveled to direct the tweeter at the listener’s position.

 
JVC video capsule

The JVC video capsule, also made primarily of plastic, is equally dated, albeit to a different decade. As its name suggests, it looks, with the video element closed, like an Apollo space capsule, and if you guessed a production date around 1970, in the wake of the moon landing, you would be correct. The fact that my 12-year-old nephew could have guessed this really locates this object in a precise cultural moment. (Actually, my nephew is really smart, and would upbraid me if he read this, saying something like “I must upbraid you, Uncle Larry.”). With the top up, the TV looks something like a robot. Being a Japanese product, I suspect that there is a specific reference to a movie or TV robot of the late 1960’s. Please send pictures if you catch it. In the end, I’m not sure this design falls on the good side of the kitsch line, but I’ve kept it because I would have loved to have one in 1970.

See "Brains and Braun," Larry Weinberg’s post on classic, timeless design.

Posted by Larry Weinberg on February 8, 2009 | Comments (4)

February 8, 2009
In response to: A Tale of Two Decades
naretev@mac.com commented:

The images of the Fontainbleau and the Phillips speakers are genius!


February 8, 2009
In response to: A Tale of Two Decades
LPW commented:

Thanks for the comments! In response to the first: an early scene in Goldfinger (1964) was indeed filmed at the Fontainebleau, but the hotel itself was built in 1954. The speakers could still date to the early 1960's, however. In response to the second: both functionalism and kitsch are complicated concepts given to ongoing revisionism, and indeed both terms have been re-valued by postmodernist critics. On the issue of form and function, the British historian and critic David Pye long ago noted that within any set of design constraints, there are an infinite number of design solutions. Form, then, should keep an eye on function, but needn't tailgate too closely. The Phillips speaker, I would argue, shares some characteristics with modern architecture that gives it a spark of visual interest and conceptual originality. Note also that Morris Lapidus has himself been variously condemned and celebrated by the design press, and will continue to be. On strict functional grounds, it is possible that the speakers actually work well-- treble is directional, and the tweeter elements pivot, and it is also possible that the boomerang curve can disperse sound in a manner analogous to how a curved antennae picks up sound. On the JVC video capsule, I'm more inclined to agree with you, except that the guts of a transistor TV require depth behind the screen--why not have it integrate into a visual design concept when not in use? Also, note that the video capsule is also a radio, and has a speaker that points forward when the top is closed. Maybe a good dual-function design trapped in a dated body?


February 8, 2009
In response to: A Tale of Two Decades
Design Outsider commented:

Form should follow function. These fail that test and really are just kitsch.


February 8, 2009
In response to: A Tale of Two Decades
design fiend commented:

So different from your last post..each piece is a time capsule. I'd say the design of the Phillips speaker is early to mid 1960's.. when was Fountainebleau Hotel built (looks early 60's)? Didn't they shoot "Gold Finger" there too?

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement